Paper detail

Revisiting INTEGRAL/SPI observations of 44Ti from Cassiopeia A

The 340-year old supernova remnant Cassiopeia A at 3.4 kpc distance is the best-studied young core-collapse supernova remnant. Nucleosynthesis yields in radioactive isotopes have been studied with different methods, in particular for production and ejection of $^{44}$Ti and $^{56}$Ni which originate from the innermost regions of the supernova. $^{44}$Ti was first discovered in this remnant, but is not seen consistently in other core-collapse sources. We analyse the observations accumulated with the SPI spectrometer on INTEGRAL, together with an improved instrumental background method, to achieve high spectroscopic resolution which enables interpretation towards a velocity constraint on $^{44}$Ti ejecta from the 1.157 MeV $γ$-ray line of the $^{44}$Sc decay. We observe both the hard X-ray line at 78 keV and the $γ$-ray line at 1157 keV from the $^{44}$Ti decay chain, at a combined significance of 3.8 $σ$. Measured fluxes are $(2.1\pm0.4)~10^{-5}~\mathrm{ph~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ and $(3.5\pm1.2)~10^{-5}~\mathrm{ph~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$, which corresponds to $(1.5\pm0.4)~10^{-4}$ and $(2.4\pm0.9)~10^{-4}~\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ of $^{44}$Ti, respectively. The measured Doppler broadening of the lines implies expansion velocities of $4300$ and $2200~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}}$, respectively. Combining our results with previous studies, we determine a more precise estimate of ejected $^{44}$Ti of $(1.37\pm0.19)~10^{-4}~\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. The measurements of both lines are consistent with previous studies. The flux in the line originating from excited $^{44}$Ca is significantly higher than the flux determined in the lines from $^{44}$Sc. Cosmic ray acceleration within the supernova remnant may be responsible for an additional contribution to this line from nuclear de-excitation following energetic particle collisions in the remnant and swept-up material.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.