Abstract
We discovered a deficiency in Algorithm 1 and Theorem 3 of [1]. The algorithm called CEMA aims to solve an energy management problem distributively. However, by means of a counter example, we show that Theorem 2 and 3 of [1] contradict each other in the case of a valid scenario, proving that the suggested algorithm does not always find the optimum. Furthermore, we provide theoretic results, showing that Theorem 3 of [1] does not hold generally. At last, we provide a rectification by adjusting the algorithm and the corresponding proof of Theorem 3.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.