Paper detail

Revisiting Cardassian Model and Cosmic Constraint

In this paper, we revisit the Cardassian model in which the radiation energy component is included. It is important for early epoch when the radiation cannot be neglected because the equation of state (EoS) of the effective dark energy becomes time variable. Therefore, it is not equivalent to the quintessence model with a constant EoS anymore. This situation was almost overlooked in the literature. By using the recent released Union2 557 of type Ia supernovae (SN Ia), the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) from Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the WiggleZ data points, the full information of cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement given by the seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observation, we constrain the Cardassian model via the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. A tight constraint is obtained: $n= -0.0479_{- 0.0732- 0.148}^{+ 0.0730+ 0.142}$ in $1,2σ$ regions. The deviation of Cardassian model from quintessence model is shown in CMB anisotropic power spectra at high l's parts due to the evolution of EoS. But it is about the order of 0.1% which cannot be discriminated by current data sets. The Cardassian model is consistent with current cosmic observational data sets.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.