Paper detail

Revisiting AP Loss for Dense Object Detection: Adaptive Ranking Pair Selection

Average precision (AP) loss has recently shown promising performance on the dense object detection task. However,a deep understanding of how AP loss affects the detector from a pairwise ranking perspective has not yet been developed.In this work, we revisit the average precision (AP)loss and reveal that the crucial element is that of selecting the ranking pairs between positive and negative samples.Based on this observation, we propose two strategies to improve the AP loss. The first of these is a novel Adaptive Pairwise Error (APE) loss that focusing on ranking pairs in both positive and negative samples. Moreover,we select more accurate ranking pairs by exploiting the normalized ranking scores and localization scores with a clustering algorithm. Experiments conducted on the MSCOCO dataset support our analysis and demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method compared with current classification and ranking loss. The code is available at https://github.com/Xudangliatiger/APE-Loss.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.