Paper detail

Revisited reference solar proton event of 23-Feb-1956: Assessment of the cosmogenic-isotope method sensitivity to extreme solar events

Our direct knowledge of solar eruptive events is limited to several decades and does not include extreme events, which can only be studied by the indirect proxy method over millennia, or by a large number of sun-like stars. There is a gap, spanning 1--2 orders of magnitude, in the strength of events between directly observed and reconstructed ones. Here, we study the proxy-method sensitivity to identify extreme solar particle events (SPEs). First, the strongest directly observed SPE (23-Feb-1956), used as a reference for proxy-based reconstructions, was revisited using the newly developed method. Next, the sensitivity of the cosmogenic-isotope method to detect a reference SPE was assessed against the precision and number of individual isotopic records, showing that it is too weak by a factor $\approx$30 to be reliably identified in a single record. Uncertainties of 10Be and 14C data are shown to be dominated by local/regional patterns and measurement errors, respectively. By combining several proxy records, an SPE 4--5 times stronger than the reference one can be potentially detected, increasing the present-day sensitivity by an order of magnitude. This will allow filling the observational gap in SPE strength distribution, thus enriching statistics of extreme events from 3--4 presently known ones to several tens. This will provide a solid basis for research in the field of extreme events, both for fundamental science, viz. solar and stellar physics, and practical applications, such as the risk assessments of severe space-based hazards for the modern technological society.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.