Paper detail

Revisited Design Criteria For STBCs With Reduced Complexity ML Decoding

The design of linear STBCs offering a low-complexity ML decoding using the well known Sphere Decoder (SD) has been extensively studied in last years. The first considered approach to derive design criteria for the construction of such codes is based on the Hurwitz-Radon (HR) Theory for mutual orthogonality between the weight matrices defining the linear code. This appproach served to construct new families of codes admitting fast sphere decoding such as multi-group decodable, fast decodable, and fast-group decodable codes. In a second Quadratic Form approach, the Fast Sphere Decoding (FSD) complexity of linear STBCs is captured by a Hurwitz Radon Quadratic Form (HRQF) matrix based in its essence on the HR Theory. In this work, we revisit the structure of weight matrices for STBCs to admit Fast Sphere decoding. We first propose novel sufficient conditions and design criteria for reduced-complexity ML decodable linear STBCs considering an arbitrary number of antennas and linear STBCs of an arbitrary coding rate. Then we apply the derived criteria to the three families of codes mentioned above and provide analytical proofs showing that the FSD complexity depends only on the weight matrices and their ordering and not on the channel gains or the number of antennas and explain why the so far used HR theory-based approaches are suboptimal.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.