Paper detail

Revisit the $X(4274)$ as the axialvector tetraquark state

In this article, we construct the $[sc]_A[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_V-[sc]_V[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_A$ type tensor current to study the mass and width of the $X(4274)$ with the QCD sum rules in details. The predicted mass $M_{X}=(4.27\pm0.09) \, \rm{GeV}$ for the $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ tetraquark state is in excellent agreement with the experimental data $4273.3 \pm 8.3 ^{+17.2}_{-3.6} \mbox MeV}$ from the LHCb collaboration. The central value of the width $Γ(X(4274)\to J/ψϕ)=47.9\,{\rm{MeV}}$ is in excellent agreement with the experimental data $56 \pm 11 ^{+8}_{-11} \mbox MeV}}$ from the LHCb collaboration. The present work supports assigning the $X(4274)$ to be the $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ $[sc]_A[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_V-[sc]_V[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_A$ tetraquark state with a relative P-wave between the diquark and antidiquark constituents. Furthermore, we obtain the mass of the $[sc]_A[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_V-[sc]_V[\bar{s}\bar{c}]_A$ type tetraquark state with $J^{PC}=1^{-+}$ as a byproduct.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.