Paper detail

Revisit of the interacting holographic dark energy model after Planck 2015

We investigate the observational constraints on the interacting holographic dark energy model. We consider five typical interacting models with the interaction terms $Q=3βHρ_{\rm{de}}$, $Q=3βHρ_{\rm{c}}$, $Q=3βH(ρ_{\rm{de}}+ρ_{\rm c})$, $Q=3βH\sqrt{ρ_{\rm{de}}ρ_{\rm c}}$, and $Q=3βH\frac{ρ_{\rm{de}}ρ_{c}}{ρ_{\rm{de}}+ρ_{\rm c}}$, respectively, where $β$ is a dimensionless coupling constant. The observational data we use in this paper include the JLA compilation of type Ia supernovae data, the Planck 2015 distance priors data of cosmic microwave background observation, the baryon acoustic oscillations measurements, and the Hubble constant direct measurement. We make a comparison for these five interacting holographic dark energy models by employing the information criteria, and we find that, within the framework of holographic dark energy, the $Q=3βH\frac{ρ_{\rm{de}}ρ_{\rm c}}{ρ_{\rm{ de}}+ρ_{\rm c}}$ model is most favored by current data, and the $Q=3βHρ_{\rm c}$ model is relatively not favored by current data. For the $Q=3βHρ_{\rm{de}}$ and $Q=3βH\frac{ρ_{\rm{de}}ρ_{\rm c}}{ρ_{\rm{ de}}+ρ_{\rm c}}$ models, a positive coupling $β$ can be detected at more than 2$σ$ significance.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.