Paper detail

Revisit of constraints on holographic dark energy: SNLS3 dataset with the effects of time-varying $β$ and different light-curve fitters

Previous studies have shown that for the Supernova Legacy Survey three-year (SNLS3) data there is strong evidence for the redshift-evolution of color-luminosity parameter $β$ of type Ia supernovae (SN Ia). In this paper, we explore the effects of varying $β$ on the cosmological constraints of holographic dark energy (HDE) model. In addition to the SNLS3 data, we also use Planck distance prior data of cosmic microwave background (CMB), as well as galaxy clustering (GC) data extracted from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release 7 and Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). We find that, for the both cases of using SN data alone and using SN+CMB+GC data, involving an additional parameter of $β$ can reduce $χ^2$ by $\sim$ 36; this shows that $β$ deviates from a constant at 6$σ$ confidence levels. Adopting SN+CMB+GC data, we find that compared to the constant $β$ case, varying $β$ yields a larger fractional matter density $Ω_{m0}$ and a smaller reduced Hubble constant $h$; moreover, varying $β$ significantly increases the value of HDE model parameter $c$, leading to $c\approx 0.8$, consistent with the constraint results obtained before Planck. These results indicate that the evolution of $β$ should be taken into account seriously in the cosmological fits. In addition, we find that relative to the differences between the constant $β$ and varying $β(z)$ cases, the effects of different light-curve fitters on parameter estimation are very small.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.