Paper detail

Revision of the Selection Function of the Optical Redshift Survey using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release: Toward an Accurate Estimate of Source Number Density of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays

If Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs) are originated from nearby galaxies, modeling of the distribution of nearby galaxies is important to an accurate estimate the source number density of UHECRs. We investigate uncertainty of the selection function of the Optical Redshift Survey (ORS), which we used to construct a source model of UHECRs. The investigation is based on a comparison of numbe counts of ORS galaxies with those of the spectroscopic sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Early Data Release (EDR). We carefully count galaxies in the same absolute magnitude bin from the two samples. We find a slight systematic overestimate of the ORS counts outside 5000 km s$^{-1}$ by about a factor of 2. We revise the selection function of the ORS assuming that the SDSS counts are correct. Our revision is based on the absorption given in the ORS catalog as well as that computed from Schlegel et al. (1998), which is systematically larger than the former by $A_B \sim 0.1$ mag in the region of low absorption. It is found that introduction of Schlegel et al.'s absorption changes one of the parameters of the ORS selection function by more than 10%. The revision should be taken into account in the future analysis of the source number density of UHECRs based on the ORS. Using the revised selection function, we determine the global structure of the Local Supercluster (LSC) with a source model of UHECRs, that is, a number-density model consisting of a uniform spherical halo and an exponential disk. We find that the revision is insignificant in terms of the structure of the LSC. However, the revised selection function will be useful to other studies such as peculiar velocity and correlation function.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.