Paper detail

Review on CFD modeling of electrostatic powder charging during pneumatic conveying

Thus far, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations fail to reliably predict the electrostatic charging of powder during pneumatic conveying. The lack of a predictive tool is one reason for unwanted discharges and growing deposits that make a plant a prime candidate for an explosion. This paper reviews the numerical models' state-of-the-art, limitations, and progress in recent years. In particular, the discussion includes the condenser model, which is up to today most popular in CFD simulations of powder flow electrification but fails to predict most of its features. New experiments led to advanced models, such as the non-uniform charge model, which resolves the local distribution of charge on non-conductive particle surfaces. Further, models relying on the surface state theory predicted bipolar charging of polydisperse particles made of the same material. Whereas these models were usually implemented in CFD tools using an Eulerian-Lagrangian strategy, powder charging was recently successfully described in an Eulerian framework. The Eulerian framework is computationally efficient when handling complete powders; thus, this research can pave the way from academic studies to simulating powder processing units. Overall, even though CFD models for powder flow charging improved, major hurdles toward a predictive tool remain.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.