Paper detail

Review of the three candidate hohlraums in ICF

In this paper, we give a review of three hohlraum geometries, including cylindrical, octahedral and six-cylinder-port hohlraums, in inertial confinement fusion (ICF) mainly from theoretical side. Every hohlraum has its own strengths and weaknesses. Although there is a problem of drive asymmetry in the cylindrical hohlraums due to some non-ideal factors, the success of ignition is still possible if more laser energy is available beyond the US National Ignition Facility (NIF) in the future. Octahedral hohlraums can provide the high symmetry flux on capsule. However, octahedral hohlraums suffer from several problems due to the complicated three-dimensional plasma conditions inside. And up to now, there is no one target design with the octahedral hohlraums in which each problem can be solved at the same time. Six-cylinder-port hohlraums combine the merits in theory of both cylindrical and octahedral hohlraums to a certain extent. We introduce a target design with good performance by using the six-cylinder-port hohlraums, in which the key issues of concern, such as laser energy, drive symmetry, and laser plasma interaction (LPI), etc, are all balanced.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.