Paper detail

Review of hadronic vacuum polarization calculations via $e^+e^-$ measurements

The discrepancy on the muon anomalous magnetic moment values obtained via a direct measurement and via a data-driven theory determination that uses the experimentally measured hadronic cross section, is among the long standing and most significant deviations from the Standard Model predictions. The recently presented final result of the direct measurement performed at the experiment at Fermilab, with an impressive accuracy of 127 parts-per-billion, further stresses the need for a theory estimate of comparable accuracy. The $e^+e^-$ hadronic cross section is the experimental input to the dispersive integral for the calculation of the hadronic contribution to the $g-2$, which is largely dominated by the $e^+e^-\to π^+π^-$ channel. Precise measurements of the $e^+e^-\to π^+π^-$ cross section with a sub-percent accuracy, in the energy region of the $ρ$-resonance peak, have been performed by several experiments, but the results differ way more than the published accuracies limiting the comparison with the Fermilab direct measurement. New results are expected to become available in the near future from KLOE, CMD-3, SND and BESIII experiments, while a new measurement from the BABAR collaboration is presented today and its impact on the present situation is discussed. This measurement makes use of the entire BABAR data set and adopts a different analysis strategy, with results (still preliminary) largely independent of the results published in the 2009 BABAR publication.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.