Paper detail

Review: Garbe, Annette. Die partiell konventional, partiell empirisch bestimmte Realität physikalischer RaumZeiten. Königshausen & Neumann: Würzburg 2001, pp. 419, ISBN: 978-3-8260-2080-3

In 2001 the book "Die partiell konventional, partiell empirisch bestimmte Realität physikalischer RaumZeiten" was published by Königshausen & Neumann, with a volume of more than 400 pages. It was written by Annette Garbe. The English translation might be: "The Partial Conventionally, Partial Empirically Determined Reality of Physical Space-Times." In the following review it is argued that Garbe's approach comes very close to Michael Friedman's contemporary defense of the relativized a priori. Whereas Friedman's analysis of the role of conventional and constitutive principles in the theory of relativity initiated much discussion in the literature, Garbe's defense of "partial determination" has been ignored by the scientific community. This is entirely unjust due to her highly original re-discovery of Ludwig Lange.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.