Paper detail

Reversible time-step adaptation for the integration of few-body systems

The time step criterion plays a crucial role in direct N-body codes. If not chosen carefully, it will cause a secular drift in the energy error. Shared, adaptive time step criteria commonly adopt the minimum pairwise time step, which suffers from discontinuities in the time evolution of the time step. This has a large impact on the functioning of time step symmetrisation algorithms. We provide new demonstrations of previous findings that a smooth and weighted average over all pairwise time steps in the N-body system, improves the level of energy conservation. Furthermore, we compare the performance of 27 different time step criteria, by considering 3 methods for weighting time steps and 9 symmetrisation methods. We present performance tests for strongly chaotic few-body systems, including unstable triples, giant planets in a resonant chain, and the current Solar System. We find that the harmonic symmetrisation methods (methods A3 and B3 in our notation) are the most robust, in the sense that the symmetrised time step remains close to the time step function. Furthermore, based on our Solar System experiment, we find that our new weighting method based on direct pairwise averaging (method W2 in our notation), is slightly preferred over the other methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.