Paper detail

Reversed Hardy-Littewood-Sobolev inequality

The classical sharp Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality states that, for $1<p, t<\infty$ and $0<λ=n-α<n$ with $ 1/p +1 /t+ λ/n=2$, there is a best constant $N(n,λ,p)>0$, such that $$ |\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x)|x-y|^{-λ} g(y) dx dy|\le N(n,λ,p)||f||_{L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)}||g||_{L^t(\mathbb{R}^n)} $$ holds for all $f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^n), g\in L^t(\mathbb{R}^n).$ The sharp form is due to Lieb, who proved the existence of the extremal functions to the inequality with sharp constant, and computed the best constant in the case of $p=t$ (or one of them is 2). Except that the case for $p\in ((n-1)/n, n/α)$ (thus $α$ may be greater than $n$) was considered by Stein and Weiss in 1960, there is no other result for $α>n$. In this paper, we prove that the reversed Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality for $0<p, t<1$, $λ<0$ holds for all nonnegative $f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^n), g\in L^t(\mathbb{R}^n).$ For $p=t$, the existence of extremal functions is proved, all extremal functions are classified via the method of moving sphere, and the best constant is computed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.