Paper detail

Reverse shock forming condition for magnetized relativistic outflows: reconciling theories and simulations

Reverse shock (RS) emission can be used to probe the properties of the relativistic ejecta, especially the degree of magnetization $σ$, in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows. However, there has been confusion in the literature regarding the physical condition for the RS formation, and the role of magnetic fields in the RS dynamics in the Poynting-flux-dominated regime is not fully understood. Exploiting the shock jump conditions, we characterize the properties of a magnetized RS. We compare the RS dynamics and forming conditions from different theories and numerical simulations, and reconcile the discrepancies among them. The strict RS forming condition is found to be $σ< σ_\mathrm{cr}=(8/3)γ_4^2(n_1/n_4)$, where $n_4$ and $n_1$ are the rest-frame number densities of the ejecta and the ambient medium, respectively, $γ_4$ is the bulk Lorentz factor, and $σ_\mathrm{cr}$ is the critical magnetization. Contrary to previous claims, we prove that this condition agrees with other theoretical and simulated results, which can be further applied to the setup and consistency check of future numerical simulations. Using this condition, we propose a characteristic radius for RS formation, and categorize the magnetized shell into three regimes: 'thick shell' (relativistic RS), 'thin shell' (trans-relativistic RS), and 'no RS' regimes. The critical magnetization $σ_\mathrm{cr}$ is generally below unity for thin shells, but can potentially reaches $\sim 100-1000$ in the 'thick shell' regime. Our results could be applied to the dynamical evolution of Poynting-flux-dominated ejecta, with potential applications to self-consistent lightcurve modelling of magnetized relativistic outflows.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.