Paper detail

Reverberation Mapping of High-Luminosity Quasars: First Results

Reverberation mapping of nearby active galactic nuclei has led to estimates of broad-line-region (BLR) sizes and central-object masses for some 37 objects to date. However, successful reverberation mapping has yet to be performed for quasars of either high luminosity (above L_opt~10^{46} erg/s) or high redshift (z>0.3). Over the past six years, we have carried out, at the Hobby-Eberly Telescope, rest-frame-ultraviolet spectrophotometric monitoring of a sample of six quasars at redshifts z=2.2--3.2, with luminosities of L_opt~10^{46.4}--10^{47.6} erg/s, an order of magnitude greater than those of previously mapped quasars. The six quasars, together with an additional five having similar redshift and luminosity properties, were monitored photometrically at the Wise Observatory during the past decade. All 11 quasars monitored show significant continuum variations of order 10%--70%. This is about a factor of two smaller variability than for lower luminosity quasars monitored over the same rest-frame period. In the six objects which have been spectrophotometrically monitored, significant variability is detected in the CIV1550 broad emission line. In several cases the variations track the continuum variations in the same quasar, with amplitudes comparable to, or even greater than, those of the corresponding continua. In contrast, no significant Lyαvariability is detected in any of the four objects in which it was observed. Thus, UV lines may have different variability trends in high-luminosity and low-luminosity AGNs. For one quasar, S5~0836+71 at z=2.172, we measure a tentative delay of 595 days between CIV and UV-continuum variations, corresponding to a rest-frame delay of 188 days and a central black-hole mass of 2.6\times10^9 M_\odot.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.