Paper detail

Reverberation and photoionization estimates of the Broad Line Region Radius in Low-z Quasars

Black Hole Mass (M_BH) estimation in quasars, especially at high redshift, involves use of single epoch spectra with s/n and resolution that permit accurate measurement of the width of a broad line assumed to be a reliable virial estimator. Coupled with an estimate of the radius of the broad line region this yields M_BH. The radius of the broad line region (BLR) may be inferred from an extrapolation of the correlation between source luminosity and reverberation derived r_BLR measures (the so-called Kaspi relation involving about 60 low z sources). We are exploring a different method for estimating r_BLR directly from inferred physical conditions in the BLR of each source. We report here on a comparison of r_BLR estimates that come from our method and from reverberation mapping. Our "photoionization" method employs diagnostic line intensity ratios in the rest-frame range 1400-2000 A (AlIII1860/SiIII]1892, CIV1549/AlIII1860) that enable derivation of the product of density and ionization parameter with the BLR distance derived from the definition of the ionization parameter. We find good agreement between our estimates of the density, ionization parameter and r_BLR and those from reverberation mapping. We suggest empirical corrections to improve the agreement between individual photoionization-derived r_BLR values and those obtained from reverberation mapping. The results in this paper can be exploited to estimate M_BH for large samples of high-z quasars using an appropriate virial broadening estimator. We show that the width of the UV intermediate emission lines are consistent with the width of H beta, therefore providing a reliable virial broadening estimator that can be measured in large samples of high-z quasars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.