Paper detail

Revealing velocity dispersion as the best indicator of a galaxy's color, compared to stellar mass, surface mass density or morphology

Using data of nearby galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey we investigate whether stellar mass, central velocity dispersion, surface mass density, or the Sersic n parameter is best correlated with a galaxy's rest-frame color. Specifically, we determine how the mean color of galaxies varies with one parameter when another is fixed. When the stellar mass is fixed we see that strong trends remain with all other parameters, whereas residual trends are weaker when surface mass density, n, or velocity dispersion are fixed. Overall velocity dispersion is the best indicator of a galaxy's typical color, showing the largest residual color dependence when any of the other three parameters are fixed, and stellar mass is the poorest. Other studies have indicated that both the halo and black hole properties are better correlated with velocity dispersion than with stellar mass, surface mass density or Sersic n. Therefore, our results are consistent with a picture where a galaxy's star formation history and present star formation rate are determined to some significant degree by the current properties and assembly history of its dark matter halo and/or the feedback from its central super massive black hole.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.