Paper detail

Revealing Non-circular beam effect in WMAP-7 CMB maps with BipoSH measures of Statistical Isotropy

Mild, unavoidable deviations from circular-symmetry of instrumental beams in current Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments now pose a significant challenge to deriving high precision inferences from the high sensitivity and resolution of CMB measurements. We present analytic results, verified by numerical simulations, that CMB maps of cosmological signal that respect underlying statistical isotropy (SI) symmetry, measured with an instrument that has mildly non-circular (NC) beam would, nevertheless, exhibit SI violation. Further, we show that appropriate observable measures constructed within the Bipolar spherical harmonic (BipoSH) representation of SI violation capture subtle NC-beam effects coupled with the scan strategy of the instrument. Accompanying their latest 7-year data release, the WMAP team published very high significance measurements of non-zero BipoSH spectra, A^{20}_{l l} and A^{20}_{l-2 l}, in the "W" and "V" band of the experiment. We present a strong case that the BipoSH measurement are primarily explained by the quadrupolar (m=2) component of the NC-beams, b_{l2}, of the respective channels. The fact that subtle levels of non-circularity, e.g., WMAP beams |b_{l2}|/b_{l0} < 0.01, lead to measurable BipoSH spectra points to the immense promise and potential of the BipoSH representation. The key result of this work is that using BipoSH measurements it is possible to estimate an equivalent single hit,'parallel transported' effective NC-beam that matches both the angular power spectrum and the non-zero BipoSH measurements of the observed maps. Hence, BipoSH analysis provides a very simple and effective characterization of CMB maps made with NC-beam. (Abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.