Paper detail

Revealing a new symbiotic X-ray binary with Gemini NIFS

We use K-band spectroscopy of the counterpart to the rapidly variable X-ray transient XMMU J174445.5-295044 to identify it as a new symbiotic X-ray binary. XMMU J174445.5-295044 has shown a hard X-ray spectrum (we verify its association with an Integral/IBIS 18-40 keV detection in 2013 using a short Swift/XRT observation), high and varying N$_H$, and rapid flares on timescales down to minutes, suggesting wind accretion onto a compact star. We observed its near-infrared counterpart using the Near-infrared Integral Field Spectrograph (NIFS) at Gemini-North, and classify the companion as ~ M2 III. We infer a distance of $3.1^{+1.8}_{-1.1}$ kpc (conservative 1-sigma errors), and therefore calculate that the observed X-ray luminosity (2-10 keV) has reached to at least 4$\times10^{34}$ erg/s. We therefore conclude that the source is a symbiotic X-ray binary containing a neutron star (or, less likely, black hole) accreting from the wind of a giant.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.