Paper detail

Retrieving cosmological information from small-scale CMB foregrounds II. The kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect

Recent results of ground-based telescopes, giving high-quality measurements of the CMB temperature power spectrum on small scales motivate the need for an accurate model of foregrounds, which dominate the primary signal at these multipoles. In a previous work, we have shown that cosmological information could be retrieved from the power spectrum of the thermal SZ effect. In this work, we introduce a physically motivated model of the Epoch of Reionisation in the cosmological analysis of CMB data, which is coherent on all scales. In particular, at high multipoles, the power spectrum of the kinetic SZ (kSZ) effect is inferred from a set of cosmological and reionisation parameters by a machine-learning algorithm. First including an asymmetric parameterisation of the reionisation history in the Planck 2018 data analysis, we retrieve a value of the optical depth consistent with previous results, but stemming from a completely different history of reionisation in which the first luminous sources light up as early as $z=15$. Considering the latest small-scale data from the SPT and letting the cosmology free to vary, we find that including the new cosmology-dependent SZ spectra helps tighten the constraints on their amplitudes by breaking their degeneracy. We report a $5σ$ measurement of the kSZ signal at $\ell=3000$, $\mathcal{D}_{3000}^\mathrm{kSZ} = 3.4^{+0.5}_{-0.3}\,μ\mathrm{K}^2$ at the 68% confidence level, marginalised over cosmology, as well as an upper limit on the patchy signal from reionisation $\mathcal{D}_{3000}^\mathrm{pkSZ}<1.6~μ\mathrm{K}^2$ (95% C.L.). Additionally, we find that the SPT data favour slightly earlier reionisation scenarios than Planck, leading to $τ= 0.062 ^{+0.012}_{-0.015}$ and a reionisation midpoint $z_\mathrm{re} = 7.9^{+1.1}_{-1.3}$ (68% C.L.), which is in line with constraints from high-redshift quasars and galaxies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.