Paper detail

Rethinking the Performance of ISAC System: From Efficiency and Utility Perspectives

Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) is an essential technology for the 6G communication system, which enables the conventional wireless communication network capable of sensing targets around. The shared use of pilots is a promising strategy to achieve ISAC. It brings a trade-off between communication and sensing, which is still unclear under the imperfect channel estimation condition. To provide some insights, the trade-off between ergodic capacity with imperfect channel estimation and ergodic Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) of range sensing is investigated. Firstly, the closedform expressions of ergodic capacity and ergodic range CRB are derived, which are associated with the number of pilots. Secondly, two novel metrics named efficiency and utility are firstly proposed to evaluate the joint performance of capacity and range sensing error. Specifically, efficiency is used to evaluate the achievable capacity per unit of the sensing error, and utility is designed to evaluate the utilization degree of ISAC. Moreover, an algorithm of pilot length optimization is designed to achieve the best efficiency. Finally, simulation results are given to verify the accuracy of analytical results, and provide some insights on designing the slot structure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.