Paper detail

Rethinking the Augmentation Module in Contrastive Learning: Learning Hierarchical Augmentation Invariance with Expanded Views

A data augmentation module is utilized in contrastive learning to transform the given data example into two views, which is considered essential and irreplaceable. However, the predetermined composition of multiple data augmentations brings two drawbacks. First, the artificial choice of augmentation types brings specific representational invariances to the model, which have different degrees of positive and negative effects on different downstream tasks. Treating each type of augmentation equally during training makes the model learn non-optimal representations for various downstream tasks and limits the flexibility to choose augmentation types beforehand. Second, the strong data augmentations used in classic contrastive learning methods may bring too much invariance in some cases, and fine-grained information that is essential to some downstream tasks may be lost. This paper proposes a general method to alleviate these two problems by considering where and what to contrast in a general contrastive learning framework. We first propose to learn different augmentation invariances at different depths of the model according to the importance of each data augmentation instead of learning representational invariances evenly in the backbone. We then propose to expand the contrast content with augmentation embeddings to reduce the misleading effects of strong data augmentations. Experiments based on several baseline methods demonstrate that we learn better representations for various benchmarks on classification, detection, and segmentation downstream tasks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.