Rethinking a Mysterious Molecular Cloud

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

I present high-resolution column density maps of two molecular clouds having strikingly different star formation rates. To better understand the unusual, massive G216-2.5, a molecular cloud with no massive star formation, the distribution of its molecular gas is compared to that of the Rosette Molecular Cloud. Far-infrared data from Herschel are used to derive N(H2)N(\mathrm{H}_2) maps of each cloud and are combined with ICOI_{\mathrm{CO}} data to determine the CO-to-H2_2 ratio, XCOX_{\mathrm{CO}}. In addition, the probability distribution functions (PDFs) and cumulative mass fractions of the clouds are compared. For G216-2.5, <N(H2)>=7.8×1020cm−2< N(\mathrm{H}_2) >=7.8\times 10^{20} cm^{-2} and <XCO>=2.2×1020(Kkms−1)−1< X_{\mathrm{CO}} > =2.2\times 10^{20} (K km s^{-1})^{-1}; for the Rosette, <N(H2)>=1.8×1021cm−2< N(\mathrm{H}_2) > =1.8\times 10^{21} cm^{-2} and <XCO>=2.8×1020(Kkms−1)−1 < X_{\mathrm{CO}} > =2.8\times 10^{20} (K km s^{-1})^{-1}. The PDFs of both clouds are log-normal for extinctions below ∼2\sim 2 mag and both show departures from log-normality at high extinctions. Although it is the less-massive cloud, the Rosette has a higher fraction of its mass in the form of dense gas and contains 1389M⊙1389 M_\odot of gas above the so-called extinction threshold for star formation, AV=7.3A_V = 7.3 mag. The G216-2.5 cloud has 874M⊙874 M_\odot of dense gas above this threshold.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.