Paper detail

Restrictions on the injection energy of positrons annihilating near the Galactic center

The origin and properties of the source of positrons annihilating in the Galactic Center is still a mystery. One of the criterion, which may discriminate between different mechanisms of positron production there, is the positron energy injection. Beacom and Yueksel (2006) suggested a method to estimate this energy from the ratio of the 511 keV line to the MeV in-flight annihilation fluxes. From the COMPTEL data they derived that the maximum injection energy of positron should be about several MeV that cut down significantly a class of models of positron origin in the GC assuming that positrons lose their energy by Coulomb collisions only. However, observations show that the strength of magnetic field in the GC is much higher than in other parts of the Galaxy, and it may range there from 100 $μ$G to several mG. In these conditions, synchrotron losses of positrons are significant that extends the range of acceptable values of positron injection energy. We show that if positrons injection in the GC is non-stationary and magnetic field is higher than 0.4 mG both radio and gamma-ray restrictions permit their energy to be higher than several GeV.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.