Paper detail

Restricted Nim with a Pass

This paper presents a study of restricted Nim with a pass. In the restricted Nim considered in this study, two players take turns and remove stones from the piles. In each turn, when the number of stones is m, each player is allowed to remove at least one stone and at most the ceiling of m/2 stones from a pile of m stones. The standard rules of the game are modified to allow a one-time pass, that is, a pass move that may be used at most once in the game and not from a terminal position. Once a pass has been used by either player, it is no longer available. It is well-known that in classical Nim, the introduction of the pass alters the underlying structure of the game, significantly increasing its complexity. In the restricted Nim considered in this study, the pass move was found to have a minimal impact. There is a simple relationship between the Grundy numbers of restricted Nim and the Grundy numbers of restricted Nim with a pass, where the number of piles can be any natural number. Therefore, the authors address a longstanding open question in combinatorial game theory: the extent to which the introduction of a pass into a game affects its behavior. The game that we developed appears to be the first variant of Nim that is fully solvable when a pass is not allowed and remains fully solvable following the introduction of a pass move.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.