Paper detail

Response relation in Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV

We carry out simulations using a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model to describe the response relation between $v_2$ and $\varepsilon_2$ in Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV, respectively. To simulate such relation, two methods have been introduced in the calculation: one is the directed response (DR) method, which correlates the outgoing particles with the initial anisotropy directly, and the other one is the cumulants response (CR) method, which is constructed from a cumulants correlation between outgoing particles. Based on calculations of the DR and CR methods, the response relations as a function of the transverse momentum are both shown in Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions. By comparing the DR and CR methods, we found that the linear response relations are almost identical in all the present collisions. Similar results of linear+cubic response relations are also shown in the higher multiplicity systems, and it has become a significant difference in the lower multiplicity systems, i.e., the peripheral Pb-Pb collisions and p-Pb collisions. Throughout the whole $p_{T}$-dependent simulations, the $κ_2$ in the linear response and in the linear+cubic response are almost identical, except for in the lower multiplicity systems by the DR method. If one implements a pseudorapidity gap by the CR calculation, the $p_{T}$-dependent and $η$-independent response relations are similarly shown in peripheral Pb-Pb systems and p-Pb systems, which may imply that a collective response exists in the most central p-Pb collisions. These collective behaviors are dominantly produced on the stage of the medium expansions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.