Abstract
We respond to the recent comment [arXiv:1105.1593] on our Letter [G. G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 165003 (2011)]. The comment claims that our argument for spectral transfer direction is incomplete. The comment gives an incomplete account of our argument. We explain how the argument of our Letter, in full, is self-contained consistent and well-supported by numerical evidence. Other technical statements made in the comment are explained to be incorrect. We direct interested readers to our forthcoming article, which should clarify any remaining technical ambiguities and also illuminate deeper physical issues.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.