Paper detail

Resonant slow extraction in synchrotrons by using anti-symmetric sextupole fields

This paper proposes a novel method for resonant slow extraction in synchrotrons by using special anti-symmetric sextupole fields, which can be produced by a special magnet structure. The method has the potential in applications demanding for very stable slow extraction from synchrotrons. Our studies show that the slow extraction at the half-integer resonance by using anti-symmetric sextupole field has some advantages compared to the normal sextupole field, and the latter is widely used in the slow extraction method. One of them is that it can work at a more distant tune from the resonance, so that it can reduce significantly the intensity variation of the extracted beam which is mainly caused by the ripples of magnet power supplies. The studies by both the Hamiltonian theory and numerical simulations show that the stable region at the proximity of the half-integer resonance by anti-symmetric sextupole field is much smaller and flatter than the one by standard sextupole field at the third-order resonance. By gradually increasing the field strength, the beam can be extracted with intensity more homogeneous than by the usual third-order resonant method, in the means of both smaller intensity variation and spike in the beginning spill. Similar to the case with a normal sextupole, we derive an empirical formula for the area of the stable region with an anti-symmetric sextupole. One can find that with the same field strength and the same tune distance to the resonance, the area of stable region or the change of the area due to the working point variation in the case of anti-symmetric sextupole is about 1/14 of the one in the case of standard sextupole. The detailed studies including beam dynamic behaviors at the proximity of other resonances, influence of 2-D field error, half-integer stop-band, and resonant slow extraction by using quadrupole field have also been presented.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.