Paper detail

Resonant low-energy electron attachment to O\(_{2}\) impurities in dense neon gas

We report measurements of resonant low-energy electron attachment to O\(_2\) molecular impurities in neon gas in the temperature range \(46.5\,\mbox{K}\le T\le 101\,\mbox{K}\). The reduced attachment frequency \(ν_A/N\) shows a well defined peak as a function of the gas density \(N\) when the electron energy is resonant with the 4th vibrational level of O\(_2^-\). For \(46.5\,\mbox{K}\le T\le 48.4\,\)K a second peak has been detected at a much higher density, which is due to the formation of ions in the 5th vibrational level. The temperature dependence of the first peak position can be explained within an ionic bubble model by computing the electron excess free energy as a function of \(T\) and \(N\). The peak shape is rationalized by taking into account the density dependent shift of the electron energy distribution function and the density of states of excess electrons in a disordered medium, and by assuming that electrons sample the gas density over a region of the order of the ionic bubble radius.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.