Paper detail

Resonant enhancement of nuclear reactions as a possible solution to the cosmological lithium problem

There is a significant discrepancy between the current theoretical prediction of the cosmological lithium abundance, mostly produced as Be7 during the Big Bang, and its observationally inferred value. We investigate whether the resonant enhancement of Be7 burning reactions may alleviate this discrepancy. We identify one narrow nuclear level in B9, E_{5/2^+} \simeq 16.7 MeV that is not sufficiently studied experimentally, and being just \sim 200 keV above the Be7+d threshold, may lead to the resonant enhancement of Be7(d,γ)B9 and Be7(d,p)ααreactions. We determine the relationship between the domain of resonant energies E_r and the deuterium separation width Γ_d that results in the significant depletion of the cosmological lithium abundance and find that (E_r, ~Γ_{d}) \simeq (170-220,~10-40) keV can eliminate current discrepancy. Such a large width at this resonant energy can be only achieved if the interaction radius for the deterium entrance channel is very large, a_{27} \ge 9 fm. Our results also imply that before dedicated nuclear experimental and theoretical work is done to clarify the role played by this resonance, the current conservative BBN prediction of lithium abundance should carry significantly larger error bars, [Li7/H]_{\rm BBN} = (2.5-6)\times 10^{-10}.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.