Paper detail

$Δ$ resonances in Ca+Ca, Ni+Ni and Au+Au reactions from 1 AGeV to 2 AGeV: Consistency between yields, mass shifts and decoupling temperatures

The Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) transport approach is used to calculate $Δ$(1232) yields in Ca+Ca, Ni+Ni and Au+Au collisions between 1 AGeV and 2 AGeV. We compare and validate two different methods to extract the yields of $Δ$(1232) resonances in such low energy nuclear collisions: Firstly, the $π^-$ spectra at low $p_\mathrm{T}$ are used to infer the $Δ$(1232) yield in A+A collisions, a method employed by the GSI/FOPI experiment. Secondly, we employ the invariant mass method used by the HADES collaboration, which has recently reported data in the $Δ^{++}\rightarrowπ^++p$ channel. We show that both methods are compatible with each other and with the theoretical calculations, indicating that the new HADES results are compatible with the previous FOPI measurements. Then we use the $Δ/nucleon$ ratio to extract the kinetic decoupling temperatures of the $Δ$(1232) resonances. We find that the extracted temperatures are consistent with the predicted mass shift of the $Δ$ resonance and the freeze-out parameters estimated from complementary studies (blast wave fits, coarse graining).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.