Paper detail

Resonances, black hole mimickers and the greenhouse effect: consequences for gravitational-wave physics

Ultracompact objects with photonspheres are known to mimic many observational features of black holes. It has been suggested that anomalous tidal heating or the presence of resonances in gravitational wave signals would be a clear imprint of a surface or absence of a horizon. Such claims and studies are all based on a frequency-domain analysis, assuming stationarity. Here we show that the object needs to first "fuel-up" until it reaches the stationary regime. The presence of a stable light ring and large light-travel times inside the object may in fact delay enormously the "charging-up" and effectively contribute to the effacement of structure. In other words, black hole mimickers behave as black holes more efficiently than previously thought. Our results have implications for other resonant systems with sharp resonances, including "floating orbits" around spinning black holes. A proper accounting of the self-force for such systems seems to be both mandatory, and would have important applications for tests of horizon physics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.