Paper detail

Resolving the tau versus electroproduction discrepancy for the I=1 vector spectral function and implications for the SM prediction for a_mu

Using only independent high-scale OPE input, we investigate QCD sum rule constraints on two currently incompatible versions of the I=1 vector spectral function, one obtained from electroproduction data, the other from hadronic tau decay data. Sum rules involving weighted integrals over the spectral functions, from threshold to a variable upper endpoint, s_0,are employed. It is shown that both the normalization and slope with respect to s_0 of the EM spectral integrals disagree with the corresponding OPE expectations, while both the normalization and slope are in good agreement when hadronic tau decay data is used instead. These results favor determinations of the leading order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to a_mu obtained using the tau decay data, and hence Standard Model predictions for a_mu compatible with the current experimental determination.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.