Paper detail

Resolving the puzzle of sound propagation in liquid helium at low temperatures

Experimental data suggests that, at temperatures below 1 K, the pressure in liquid helium has a cubic dependence on density. Thus the speed of sound scales as a cubic root of pressure. Near a critical pressure point, this speed approaches zero whereby the critical pressure is negative, thus indicating a cavitation instability regime. We demonstrate that to explain this dependence, one has to view liquid helium as a mixture of three quantum Bose liquids: dilute (Gross-Pitaevskii-type) Bose-Einstein condensate, Ginzburg-Sobyanin-type fluid, and logarithmic superfluid. Therefore, the dynamics of such a mixture is described by a quantum wave equation, which contains not only the polynomial (Gross-Pitaevskii and Ginzburg-Sobyanin) nonlinearities with respect to a condensate wavefunction, but also a non-polynomial logarithmic nonlinearity. We derive an equation of state and speed of sound in our model, and show their agreement with experiment.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.