Paper detail

Resolving the NO$ν$A and T2K tension in the presence of Neutrino Non-Standard interactions

The current data of the two long-baseline accelerator experiments NO$ν$A and T2K, shows a tension at more than 90$\%$ C.L. for 2 degrees of freedom, in the determination of the standard CP-phase $δ_{\mathrm {CP}}$ in case of neutrino normal ordering (NO). NO$ν$A measures the value close to $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 0.8 π$, while T2K prefers the value of $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 1.4 π$. We show that such a tension can be resolved if one hypothesizes the existence of neutral-current non-standard interactions (NSI) of neutrinos involving the flavor changing type $e-μ$ or the $e-τ$ sectors with couplings $|\varepsilon_{eμ}| \sim |\varepsilon_{eτ}|\sim 0.2$. Remarkably, our analyses show that in the presence of such NSI, both the experiments point towards the same common value of the standard CP-phase $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 3π/2$, thereby indicating towards the maximal CP-violation in the standard $3ν$ framework. We also show that the best fit values of the new CP-phases $ϕ_{eμ}$ or $ ϕ_{eτ}$ are close to $\sim 3π/2$, hence pointing towards the maximal CP-violation in the NSI sector.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.