Paper detail

Resolving the inner accretion flow towards the central supermassive black hole in SDSS J1339+1310

We studied the accretion disc structure in the doubly imaged lensed quasar SDSS J1339+1310 using $r$-band light curves and UV-visible to near-IR (NIR) spectra from the first 11 observational seasons after its discovery. The 2009$-$2019 light curves displayed pronounced microlensing variations on different timescales, and this microlensing signal permitted us to constrain the half-light radius of the 1930 Å continuum-emitting region. Assuming an accretion disc with an axis inclined at 60 deg to the line of sight, we obtained log$_{10}$($r_{1/2}$/cm) = 15.4$^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$. We also estimated the central black hole mass from spectroscopic data. The width of the Civ, Mgii, and H$β$ emission lines, and the continuum luminosity at 1350, 3000, and 5100 Å, led to log$_{10}$($M_{BH}$/M$_{\odot}$) = 8.6 $\pm$ 0.4. Thus, hot gas responsible for the 1930 Å continuum emission is likely orbiting a 4.0 $\times$ 10$^8$ M$_{\odot}$ black hole at an $r_{1/2}$ of only a few tens of Schwarzschild radii.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.