Paper detail

Resolving the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations

We use a large set of cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations to examine the effect of mass resolution and box size on synthetic Lya forest spectra at 2 \leq z \leq 5. The mass resolution requirements for the convergence of the mean Lya flux and flux power spectrum at z=5 are significantly stricter than at lower redshift. This is because transmission in the high redshift Lya forest is primarily due to underdense regions in the intergalactic medium (IGM), and these are less well resolved compared to the moderately overdense regions which dominate the Lya forest opacity at z~2-3. We further find that the gas density distribution in our simulations differs significantly from previous results in the literature at large overdensities (Δ>10). We conclude that studies of the Lya forest at z=5 using SPH simulations require a gas particle mass of M_gas \leq 2x10^5 M_sol/h, which is >8 times the value required at z=2. A box size of at least 40 Mpc/h is preferable at all redshifts.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.