Paper detail

Resolving the Excess of Long GRBs at low redshift in the Swift Era

Utilizing more than 100 long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) in the Swift-Ryan-2012 sample that include the observed redshifts and jet angles, Le & Mehta performed a timely study of the rate-density of LGRBs with an assumed broken power law GRB spectrum and obtained a GRB-burst-rate functional form that gives acceptable fits to the preSwift and Swift redshift and jet angle distributions. The results indicated an excess of LGRBs at redshift below $z \sim 2$ in the Swift sample. In this work, we are investigating if the excess is caused by the cosmological Hubble constant $H_0$, the $γ$-ray energy released $E_γ$, the low- and high-energy indices ($α, β$) of the Band function, the minimum and maximum jet angles $θ_{\rm j,min}$ and $θ_{\rm j, max}$, or that the excess is due to a biased in the Swift-Ryan-2012 sample. Our analyses indicate that none of the above physical parameters resolved the excess problem, but suggesting that the Swift-Ryan-2012~sample is biased with possible afterglow selection effect. The following model physical parameter values provide the best fit to the Swift-Ryan-2012 and preSwift~samples: the Hubble constant $H_0 = 72 \, {\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$, the energy released $E_γ\sim 4.47 \times 10^{51}$ erg, the energy indices $α\sim 0.9$ and $β\sim -2.13$, the jet angles of $θ_{\rm j,max} \sim 0.8$ rad, and $θ_{\rm j, min} \sim 0.065$ and $\sim 0.04$ rad for preSwift and Swift, respectively, $s \sim -1.55$ the jet angle power-law index, and a GRB formation rate that is similar to the Hopkins & Beacom observed star formation history and as extended by Li. Using the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxy Legacy Survey (SHOALS) Swift-Perley LGRB sample and applying the same physical parameter values as above, however, our model provides consistent results with this data set and indicating no excess of LGRBs at any redshift.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.