Paper detail

Resolving different sources of fast X-ray variability of the dwarf nova RU Peg in quiescence

We analysed an X-ray light curve of the dwarf nova RU Peg taken by XMM-Newton with a duration of 46300 s. The power density spectrum has a complicated shape with two red noise and two white noise components, indicating the presence of two turbulent regions. We developed a statistical "toy model" to study light curves with variability produced by an unstable turbulent accretion flow from the inner disc. Our results are consistent with a disc truncation radius maximally 0.8 x 10^9 cm. We found that any fluctuation of the viscous mass accretion at the inner disc are visible as UV and X-ray variations with the same break frequency in the power density spectrum. This process is generating low frequency variability. A second break suggests the presence of a faster X-ray variability component which must be generated by another process likely localised between the inner disc and the white dwarf.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.