Paper detail

Resolved Stellar Mass Maps of Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields: Evidence for Mass Dependency in Environmental Quenching

One of the challenges in understanding the quenching processes for galaxies is connecting progenitor star-forming populations to their descendant quiescent populations over cosmic time. Here we attempt a novel approach to this challenge by assuming that the underlying stellar mass distribution of galaxies is not significantly altered during environmental quenching processes that solely affect the gas content of cluster galaxies, such as strangulation and ram-pressure stripping. Using the deep, high-resolution photometry of the Hubble Frontier Fields, we create resolved stellar mass maps for both cluster and field galaxies, from which we determine 2D Sérsic profiles, and obtain Sérsic indices and half-mass radii. We classify the quiescent cluster galaxies into disk-like and bulge-like populations based on their Sérsic indices, and find that bulge-like quiescent galaxies dominate the quiescent population at higher masses ($M_\star > 10^{9.5}M_\odot$), whereas disk-like quiescent galaxies dominate at lower masses ($10^{8.5}M_\odot< M_\star < 10^{9.5}M_\odot$). Using both the Sérsic indices and half-mass radii, we identify a population of quiescent galaxies in clusters that are "morphological analogues" of field star-forming galaxies. These analogues are interpreted to be star-forming galaxies that had been environmentally quenched. We use these morphological analogues to compute the environmental-quenching efficiency, and we find that the efficiency decreases with increasing stellar mass. This demonstrates that environmental quenching is more effective on less massive galaxies and that the effect of environment on quenching galaxies is not completely separable from the effect of mass on quenching galaxies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.