Paper detail

RESOLVE and ECO: Finding Low-Metallicity $z\sim0$ Dwarf AGN Candidates Using Optimized Emission-Line Diagnostics

Existing star-forming vs. active galactic nucleus (AGN) classification schemes using optical emission-line diagnostics mostly fail for low-metallicity and/or highly star-forming galaxies, missing AGN in typical $z\sim0$ dwarfs. To recover AGN in dwarfs with strong emission lines (SELs), we present a classification scheme optimizing the use of existing optical diagnostics. We use SDSS emission-line catalogs overlapping the volume- and mass-limited RESOLVE and ECO surveys to determine the AGN percentage in SEL dwarfs. Our photoionization grids show that the [O III]/H$β$ versus [S II]/H$α$ diagram (SII plot) and [O III]/H$β$ versus [O I]/H$α$ diagram (OI plot) are less metallicity sensitive and more successful in identifying dwarf AGN than the popular [O III]/H$β$ versus [N II]/H$α$ diagnostic (NII plot or &#34;BPT diagram&#34;). We identify a new category of &#34;star-forming AGN&#34; (SF-AGN) classified as star-forming by the NII plot but as AGN by the SII and/or OI plots. Including SF-AGN, we find the $z\sim0$ AGN percentage in dwarfs with SELs to be $\sim$3-16\%, far exceeding most previous optical estimates ($\sim$1\%). The large range in our dwarf AGN percentage reflects differences in spectral fitting methodologies between catalogs. The highly complete nature of RESOLVE and ECO allows us to normalize strong emission-line galaxy statistics to the full galaxy population, reducing the dwarf AGN percentage to $\sim$0.6-3.0\%. The newly identified SF-AGN are mostly gas-rich dwarfs with halo mass $ < 10^{11.5} M_\odot$, where highly efficient cosmic gas accretion is expected. Almost all SF-AGN also have low metallicities (Z $\lesssim 0.4$ Z$_\odot$), demonstrating the advantage of our method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.