Paper detail

Resolvability in Eγ with Applications to Lossy Compression and Wiretap Channels

We study the amount of randomness needed for an input process to approximate a given output distribution of a channel in the $E_γ$ distance. A general one-shot achievability bound for the precision of such an approximation is developed. In the i.i.d.~setting where $γ=\exp(nE)$, a (nonnegative) randomness rate above $\inf_{Q_{\sf U}: D(Q_{\sf X}||π_{\sf X})\le E} \{D(Q_{\sf X}||π_{\sf X})+I(Q_{\sf U},Q_{\sf X|U})-E\}$ is necessary and sufficient to asymptotically approximate the output distribution $π_{\sf X}^{\otimes n}$ using the channel $Q_{\sf X|U}^{\otimes n}$, where $Q_{\sf U}\to Q_{\sf X|U}\to Q_{\sf X}$. The new resolvability result is then used to derive a one-shot upper bound on the error probability in the rate distortion problem, and a lower bound on the size of the eavesdropper list to include the actual message in the wiretap channel problem. Both bounds are asymptotically tight in i.i.d.~settings.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.