Paper detail

Resolution limit of data-driven coarse-grained models spanning chemical space

Increasing the efficiency of materials design and discovery remains a significant challenge, especially given the prohibitively large size of chemical compound space. The use of a chemically transferable coarse-grained model enables different molecular fragments to map to the same bead type, while also reducing computational expense. These properties further increase screening efficiency, as many compounds are screened through the use of a single coarse-grained simulation, effectively reducing the size of chemical compound space. Here, we propose new criteria for the rational design of coarse-grained models that allows for the optimization of their chemical transferability and evaluate the Martini model within this framework. We further investigate the scope of this chemical transferability by parameterizing three Martini-like models, in which the number of bead types ranges from five to sixteen for the different force fields. We then implement a Bayesian approach to determining which chemical groups are more likely to be present on fragments corresponding to specific bead types for each model. We demonstrate that a level of performance and accuracy comparable to Martini can be obtained by using a force field with fewer bead types. However, the advantage of including more bead types is a reduction of uncertainty with respect to back-mapping these bead types to specific chemistries. Just as reducing the size of the coarse-grained particles leads to a finer mapping of conformational space, increasing the number of bead types yields a finer mapping of chemical compound space. Finally, we note that, due to the relatively large size of the chemical fragments that map to a single martini bead, a clear resolution limit arises when using the water/octanol partition free energy as the only descriptor when coarse-graining chemical compound space.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.