Paper detail

Resilient Flow Decomposition of Unicast Connections with Network Coding

In this paper we close the gap between end-to-end diversity coding and intra-session network coding for unicast connections resilient against single link failures. In particular, we show that coding operations are sufficient to perform at the source and receiver if the user data can be split into at most two parts over the filed GF(2). Our proof is purely combinatorial and based on standard graph and network flow techniques. It is a linear time construction that defines the route of subflows A, B and A+B between the source and destination nodes. The proposed resilient flow decomposition method generalizes the 1+1 protection and the end-to-end diversity coding approaches while keeping both of their benefits. It provides a simple yet resource efficient protection method feasible in 2-connected backbone topologies. Since the core switches do not need to be modified, this result can bring benefits to current transport networks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.