Paper detail

Resilience of helical fields to turbulent diffusion II: direct numerical simulations

The recent study of Blackman and Subramanian (Paper I) indicates that large scale helical magnetic fields are resilient to turbulent diffusion in the sense that helical fields stronger than a critical value, decay on slow (~resistively mediated), rather than fast ($\sim$ turbulent) time scales. This gives more credence to potential fossil field origin models of the magnetic fields in stars, galaxies and compact objects. We analyze a suite of direct numerical simulations (DNS) of decaying large scale helical magnetic fields in the presence of non-helical turbulence to further study the physics of helical field decay. We study two separate cases: (1) the initial field is large enough to decay resistively, is tracked until it transitions to decay fast, and the critical large scale helical field at that transition is sought; (2) the case of Paper I, wherein there is a critical initial helical field strength below which the field undergoes fast decay right from the beginning. In case (1), both DNS and solutions of the two scale model (from Paper 1), reveal that the transition energy, $E_{c1}$, is independent of the scale of the turbulent forcing, within a small range of $\Rm$. We also find that the kinetic alpha, $α_K$, is subdominant to magnetic alpha, $α_M$, in the DNS, justifying an assumption in the two scale model. For case (2), we show exact solutions of two scale model in the limit of $η\rightarrow 0$ in fully helical case, leading to the transition energy, $E_{c2} = (k_1/\kf)^2 M_{eq}$, where $k_1$ and $\kf$ are the large scale and small turbulent forcing scale respectively and $M_{eq}$ is the equipartition magnetic energy. The DNS in this case agree qualitatively with the two scale model but the $R_M$ currently achievable, is too small to satisfy a condition $3/R_M << (k_1/k_f)^2$, necessary to robustly reveal the transition, $E_{c2}$ (Abridged).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.