Paper detail

Resilience of antagonistic networks with regard to the effects of initial failures and degree-degree correlations

In this study, we investigate the resilience of duplex networked layers ($α$ and $β$) coupled with antagonistic interlinks, each layer of which inhibits its counterpart at the microscopic level, changing the following factors: whether the influence of the initial failures in $α$ remains (quenched (Case Q)) or not (free (Case F)); the effect of intralayer degree-degree correlations in each layer and interlayer degree-degree correlations; and the type of the initial failures, such as random failures (RFs) or targeted attacks (TAs). We illustrate that the percolation processes repeat in both Cases Q and F, although only in Case F are nodes that initially failed reactivated. To analytically evaluate the resilience of each layer, we develop a methodology based on the cavity method for deriving the size of a giant component (GC). Strong hysteresis, which is ignored in the standard cavity analysis, is observed in the repetition of the percolation processes particularly in Case F. To handle this, we heuristically modify interlayer messages for macroscopic analysis, the utility of which is verified by numerical experiments. The percolation transition in each layer is continuous in both Cases Q and F. We also analyze the influences of degree-degree correlations on the robustness of layer $α$, in particular for the case of TAs. The analysis indicates that the critical fraction of initial failures that makes the GC size in layer $α$ vanish depends only on its intralayer degree-degree correlations. Although our model is defined in a somewhat abstract manner, it may have relevance to ecological systems that are composed of endangered species (layer $α$) and invaders (layer $β$), the former of which are damaged by the latter whereas the latter are exterminated in the areas where the former are active.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.