Paper detail

Research on rolling friction's dependence on ball bearings' radius

There are two alternative historical laws of rolling resistance formulated by French scientist Coulomb and Dupuit. It has been decided to verify experimentally again, which of these laws describes freely rolling ball bearings on a hard surface better. An inducement to carrying out the measurements was the idea of the constant thickness of roadbed, which is consistent with Dupuit's theory. Measurements have been done using the damped oscillations in the pendulum bearings. Results have shown better consistency with the Coulomb's theory with small, but measurable deviations. These deviations were successfully explained by the so called "Cobblestones model". Parameters designated by this model have been successfully verified by the surface roughness's profile measurement. An additional theoretical aspect of this work is distinguishing two types of rolling friction force: dynamical and kinematical in an analogy to two types of specific heat capacity in the thermodynamics of gases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.